|
|
11-23-2016, 03:26 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 125
|
A subject that has been talked about widely by a few people in the SEO people group is the thought that having a W3C agreeable site is either basic to SEO or it's most certainly not. Most as of late, Edward Lewis and I bantered forward and backward on Twitter, with Edward holding firm to his long-standing position that consistence is essential and me standing firm that 100% consistence is not really a figure positioning.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | |
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| data validation | johnstyle | Javascript | 1 | 09-03-2014 12:18 AM |
| What is w3c validation ? | spyindiavimlesh | Search Engine Optimization | 26 | 02-20-2014 04:41 AM |
| w3c validation errors | sansoni1 | Programming General | 1 | 11-06-2013 01:19 AM |
| W3C Validation in SEO | sameerseo | Search Engine Optimization | 6 | 08-09-2012 12:03 PM |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:57 AM.